[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: S-100 68K CPU board status

To: N8VEM-S100 <n8vem...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: S-100 68K CPU board status
From: lynchaj <lyn...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:28:00 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lyn...@yahoo.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lyn...@yahoo.com; dkim=pass head...@yahoo.com
In-reply-to: <4EFA20BF.6040507@pikeaero.com>
References: <002f01ccc183$7bb7ee70$7327cb50$@YAHOO.COM> <001301ccc199$9de6fde0$d9b4f9a0$@vitasoft.org> <4EF4DE99.8070908@gmail.com> <000301ccc1bf$a4e1d680$eea58380$@vitasoft.org> <4EF52036.4060403@gmail.com> <000001ccc1e5$ea4231e0$bec695a0$@vitasoft.org> <4EF54689.7020109@gmail.com> <000001ccc1f6$6d9727c0$48c57740$@vitasoft.org> <002f01ccc24a$f3ca6d80$db5f4880$@YAHOO.COM> <000a01ccc264$06708fa0$1351aee0$@vitasoft.org> <000601ccc26c$48a74500$d9f5cf00$@YAHOO.COM> <4EF9C5B0.8000202@pikeaero.com> <034ba9ee-eaca-4cab-b3ea-f56d8f49c777@n39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <4EF9D6A2.2050005@pikeaero.com> <4EF9E367.6060905@pikeaero.com> <6084052c-4acd-4af7-bd8b-fe3061526699@a17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <4EFA20BF.6040507@pikeaero.com>
User-agent: G2/1.0

Woof!  OK, that's weird.

My guess is Alcyon C compiler is really old and predates much of the
now more standardized C conventions.

I've never seen or heard of anything like you just described.  This
must be really obscure stuff.

Here is a post on comp.os.cpm which seems to discuss the unnamed
structs

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.cpm/msg/398560ac7ef058b6

Forgive my ignorance but do you think the Alcyon C compiler is capable
of successfully compiling the CP/M-68K sources?

Thanks and have a nice day!

Andrew Lynch

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [N8VEM-S100:606] Re: S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: Mike <mi...@pikeaero.com>
- Alcyon C Compiler [aka CP/M-68K compiler]
  - From: Mike <mi...@pikeaero.com>

References:
- S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: "Andrew Lynch" <LYN...@YAHOO.COM>
- RE: [N8VEM-S100:562] S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: "John Monahan" <mon...@vitasoft.org>
- Re: [N8VEM-S100:563] S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: John Coffman <john...@gmail.com>
- RE: [N8VEM-S100:564] S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: "John Monahan" <mon...@vitasoft.org>
- Re: [N8VEM-S100:565] S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: John Coffman <john...@gmail.com>
- RE: [N8VEM-S100:566] S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: "John Monahan" <mon...@vitasoft.org>
- Re: [N8VEM-S100:568] S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: John Coffman <john...@gmail.com>
- RE: [N8VEM-S100:569] S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: "John Monahan" <mon...@vitasoft.org>
- RE: [N8VEM-S100:570] S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: "Andrew Lynch" <LYN...@YAHOO.COM>
- RE: [N8VEM-S100:571] S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: "John Monahan" <mon...@vitasoft.org>
- RE: [N8VEM-S100:572] S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: "Andrew Lynch" <LYN...@YAHOO.COM>
- Re: [N8VEM-S100:573] S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: Mike <mi...@pikeaero.com>
- Re: S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: lynchaj <lyn...@yahoo.com>
- Re: [N8VEM-S100:592] Re: S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: Mike <mi...@pikeaero.com>
- Re: [N8VEM-S100:594] Re: S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: Mike <mi...@pikeaero.com>
- Re: S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: lynchaj <lyn...@yahoo.com>
- Re: [N8VEM-S100:601] Re: S-100 68K CPU board status
  - From: Mike <mi...@pikeaero.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [N8VEM-S100:601] Re: S-100 68K CPU board status
Next by Date: Re: [N8VEM-S100:606] Re: S-100 68K CPU board status
Previous by thread: Re: [N8VEM-S100:601] Re: S-100 68K CPU board status
Next by thread: Re: [N8VEM-S100:606] Re: S-100 68K CPU board status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread