Hi Jack! Thanks! I am sure we can design a modification to the S-100
bus extender board to include the bus terminator. My concern is messing
up the bus extender design by introducing the bus termination
circuitry. It does make some sense though to roll the bus terminator
into the bus extender rather than make a new separate board.
I�d like to hear more about what John has to say on the idea. One hitch
I see is that the bus extender board is not IEEE-696 form factor
compatible and would interfere with closing an S-100 chassis.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
*From:*n8vem...@googlegroups.com [mailto:n8vem...@googlegroups.com]
*On Behalf Of *Jack Rubin
*Sent:* Sunday, February 10, 2013 12:59 PM
*To:* n8vem...@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [N8VEM-S100:1394] S-100 Bus Terminator
I�ve always liked the EXTERMINATOR, for the name if nothing else, but
I�m not sure that combining termination with an extension card is
useful. I tend to want to use an extender that won�t disturb the
existing system which may or may not already have termination, and if
termination is needed, then I wouldn�t want to sacrifice an extension
card to provide it. I�d rather see a short board which simply provides
termination in the minimal amount of space required. The CompuPro active
terminator is only about 3 inches high.
Jack
*From:*n8vem...@googlegroups.com <mailto:n8vem...@googlegroups.com>
[mailto:n8vem...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul Birkel
*Sent:* Sunday, February 10, 2013 2:38 AM
*To:* n8vem...@googlegroups.com <mailto:n8vem...@googlegroups.com>
*Subject:* Re: [N8VEM-S100:1375] S-100 Bus Terminator
Andrew:
Being a congenital penny-pincher, as well as a "tweaker", it strikes me
as a lost opportunity to define a PCB like this with *lots* of unused
space (and yet sucking up a full S-100 slot). At a minimum, how about
filling the remaining space with a through-hole proto-area array? It
would/could be accompanied by appropriate regulators along one edge but
the setup/layout would be spatially similar to the buffered proto-board
(replacing the buffer-area with the line-clamp area). This would leave
opportunities for experimenters (with legacy S-100 backplanes) to
wire-up small accessory circuits -- else no impact on the termination
function?
Alternatively, place the bus-terminator circuitry onto the unused area
of the bus-extender card and get three-in-one functionality with
extension, termination, and probe functions. An example of this
approach of combining termination and extension was the VTE100a
"EXTERMINATOR"; see:
http://maben.homeip.net/static/S100/vamp/cards/VMP%20VTE%20100-A%20Terminator.pdf
http://maben.homeip.net/static/S100/vamp/photos/VAMP%20VTE-100%20Exterminator.jpg
http://maben.homeip.net/static/S100/vamp/photos/VTE%20100a%20Exterminator.gif
If trying to go 3-in-1 ends up running into real estate issues then just
combine termination & extension like the VAMP.
Another possibility would be to commit all/part of the (above) proposed
proto-area to specific generally-useful functions. Two possibilities
would be a configurable basic UART serial I/O port and/or a configurable
8 or 16-bit (E)EPROM handling up to 1 MB chips. I believe that someone
pointed out recently that it would be useful to have a board with these
sorts of basic functions in order "bring-up" legacy CPU PCBs in a
minimal configuration. One could possibly swap one of these options for
the probe in a 3-in-1 configuration? Unfortunately it seems to me that
when including the extension-function that the resulting routing
problems when adding something like I/O or ROM might require a lot of
accessory over-board wires to effectively provide a (minimal) third
connection-plane. So that might not be a good idea. But the VAMP
illustrates that termination+extension go together quite well.
My preference would be to leave the existing probe+extension PCB alone,
and instead look towards combining termination, Serial I/O, and (E)EPROM
into a single card. This plus legacy CPU and RAM cards would result in
a functional system on any "naked backplane". If some RAM could be
squeezed into this multi-purpose board, so much the better :->. We have
all of these circuits in tested-form, the only issue would seem to be
routing. This sort of board would also be useful to a wider audience
who could only populate the subsections of immediate need (e.g., not
actually use the termination section if employing a self-terminated
backplane) -- and this would increase the board-orders and therefore the
likelihood that we'll quickly reach a good ROI threshold.
The bottom line for me is that a pure termination PCB seems like a lost
opportunity. And might not easily reach critical-mass for a board-order
:-<.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Andrew Lynch <LYN...@yahoo.com
<mailto:LYN...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
Hi
Attached are the schematic and PCB layout files for the S-100 Bus
Terminator.
Please review and send any changes and/or corrections to me.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "N8VEM-S100" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to n8vem-s100+...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:n8vem-s100%2...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "N8VEM-S100" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to n8vem-s100+...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:n8vem-s100+...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2013.0.2897 / Virus Database: 2639/6094 - Release Date: 02/10/13
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "N8VEM-S100" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to n8vem-s100+...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:n8vem-s100+...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "N8VEM-S100" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to n8vem-s100+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.