Hi Bob,
I didn't think to discuss the baud rate, good point! The UART port is running at 9600. So, running dual output, I am able to display the BIOS.ASM that comes with CP/M 2.2 in about 17 seconds. Running to just the Propeller I/O, it dumps in about 12 seconds. IMHO, not significant enough to cancel support to the Com-Port. I am continuing to run my system with the dual output, besides, it's kind of cool to type here and see output there. Cheers, Josh From: bbel...@gmail.com To: n8vem...@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [N8VEM-S100:5903] Propeller Console I/O Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 16:07:31 -0500 Josh, what baud rate is your UART com port running at? A 33% increase in speed by dropping the communications to/from the serial terminal doesn’t sound like much over, say, 9600 baud. But if you are already running it pretty fast (like 57,600), then a 33% increase is significant.
A couple of years ago, I modified my CPM2.2 BIOS (and boot loader and monitor ROM) to work just as you describe – with at least one, but possibly two consoles, both working in parallel. My motivation was so I would continue to have access to my system in the event that the Fulcrum Computer Intelligent Video Interface (IVI), which is an S-100 terminal on a board, and which runs very fast – about the equivalent of 100,000 baud, would die.
I’m guessing that the Propeller board is similar is speed and function to my IVI, just modern design and hardware as opposed to the 8085 and 8275 components of my board.
Cheers!
Bob Bell
From: n8vem...@googlegroups.com [mailto:n8vem...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Crusty OMO
Hi Guys, -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "N8VEM-S100" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to n8vem-s100+...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |