[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [N8VEM-S100:0] Re: S-100 4MB SRAM boards
- To: n8vem-s100@googlegroups.com
- Subject: Re: [N8VEM-S100:0] Re: S-100 4MB SRAM boards
- From: Jack Rubin <jack....@ameritech.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:06:31 -0800 (PST)
- Authentication-results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 98.139.91.232 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jack....@ameritech.net) smtp.mail=jack....@ameritech.net; dkim=pass (test mode) head...@ameritech.net
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ameritech.net; s=s1024; t=1295888792; bh=Wod2bwewt55JJBtf31aV345KeC9AhaPwWV0rd//Km0I=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YXGHBHfJDww9auNO3nDCsYhRPXoG3oPslRnysFSvBdZrT37zskZ8nizYU1OLhbGLJwfh2nP4DmRY8q421KXEv5qLvcmxDbJrfmLNpFGP+eimk6sMyPeKldrO083Tgpm4VkIgmngQTsB0hRP3CV278HiM2u+ZkvgtsUEysswtnko=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ameritech.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=x4hLF3YqazF0ERtoBI04LIa2smponGyluF/LRlaZOWqHCkSR/eQ5ia5nAyE9j9Z4J7ZJHl9EH79yD7ElXvGWmPdCUfCe6NR0kMDDQjfy2hi9ANgPR3tTV38KjZ5Rq/WO3lYlacccyPhtTzLu7t838e1u8Hp5RWkFcqtw5NdyDfY=;
- In-reply-to: <f5529ed9-e0fb-4830-9cf9-999316369ede@e9g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
- References: <51CBFE4F42464E9999A237F3633D99ED@andrewdesktop> <000f01cbbba4$fcf4bf80$f6de3e80$@com> <f5529ed9-e0fb-4830-9cf9-999316369ede@e9g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
I'd like to keep the cost in the $20-25 range.
Jack
----- Original Message ----
> From: lynchaj <lyn...@yahoo.com>
> To: N8VEM-S100 <n8vem...@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Mon, January 24, 2011 10:59:28 AM
> Subject: [N8VEM-S100:0] Re: S-100 4MB SRAM boards
>
> Hi! What we are doing now seems to be working well. It is the usual
> trade-offs between cost and time required. I can see some builders
> would rather speed things up at greater expense. That makes sense to
> me on the other hand I am sensitive to cost and trying to keep the
> PCBs as affordable as possible. Basically all I am looking for is
> comments and ideas thinking about how to improve the process. I would
> like to speed up the development of boards and have faster cycles.
>
> What we really need is a super-computer for trace routing and an on
> site PCB prototyping CNC machine. Just whip up the designs and the
> machine chunks out the PCBs. *That* would speed things along but the
> costs are a *little* out my league. :-)
>
> I am open to discuss the process and consider ideas. Improvements are
> certainly welcome!
>
> Thanks and have a nice day!
>
> Andrew Lynch
>
> On Jan 24, 3:59 am, "Ian Douglas" <aar...@aarggh.com> wrote:
> > Hi Andrew, and all,
> >
> > Just my 2c, whatever the costs are, so be it, but for me personally I
> > really, really like the $20 per board, even if it means a little delay it
> > means I can get multiples of the same boards in case of problems as I
> > perceive this as a long haul effort. I'd also kind of suspect the cheaper
> > price also opens it up for those who are curious about vintage computing,
> > but may perhaps otherwise be discouraged by a higher price. The price vs
> > effort vs perceived reward?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ian
> >
>