[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [N8VEM-S100:1049] Upcoming S-100 SMB Reorder

To: "n8vem...@googlegroups.com" <n8vem...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [N8VEM-S100:1049] Upcoming S-100 SMB Reorder
From: Tom Lafleur <laf...@lafleur.us>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 05:17:15 -0700
Authentication-results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.160.48 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of laf...@lafleur.us) smtp.mail=laf...@lafleur.us
Cc: "n8vem...@googlegroups.com" <n8vem...@googlegroups.com>
In-reply-to: <CAJj77rtkzQttLcUf9_EXp34ywea5NdoQ3S9Enm70RxMioJDScw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJj77rtkzQttLcUf9_EXp34ywea5NdoQ3S9Enm70RxMioJDScw@mail.gmail.com>

I like the HP display and have some waiting for the boards....

Tom...


i~~ _/) ~~~~ _/) ~~~~ _/) ~~~~ _/) ~~i

Tom Lafleur
(858) 759-9692

On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:15 AM, Paul Birkel <pbi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Regarding the upcoming S-100 SMB
> (http://s100computers.com/My%20System%20Pages/SMB%20Board/S100%20Bus%20SMB.htm)
> reorder, should we consider whether if there are no particular
> advantages of the expen$ive HP 5082-7340 displays (e.g.?
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/5082-7340-Manu-HP-Encapsulation-DIP-8-5082-73xx-Hexadecimal-And-Numeric-/110933733537)
> over the TIL displays that we drop the daughter board for the former
> as a means of shaving the total cost of the board-set a little?
> 
> paul

References:
- Upcoming S-100 SMB Reorder
  - From: Paul Birkel <pbi...@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [N8VEM-S100:1049] Upcoming S-100 SMB Reorder
Next by Date: RE: [N8VEM-S100:1049] Upcoming S-100 SMB Reorder
Previous by thread: RE: [N8VEM-S100:1049] Upcoming S-100 SMB Reorder
Next by thread: RE: [N8VEM-S100:1049] Upcoming S-100 SMB Reorder
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread