[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [N8VEM-S100:3030] Zilog Z8530A vs Zilog Z8530
- To: n8vem-s100@googlegroups.com
- Subject: Re: [N8VEM-S100:3030] Zilog Z8530A vs Zilog Z8530
- From: Gary Kaufman <geka...@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 13:49:02 -0400
- Authentication-results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of geka...@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=geka...@gmail.com; dkim=pass head...@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dHTtTgLC+1T+6JaTiFhfn9WXxa2ZsSsuXUY2k4VglgE=; b=IIPJMf6IDqdYCDv4kcj6a6OfTcyxFl3moNV9I8gTqooCYGw9Mi1e8EqUxuL0S0fiwx C7PR1l0GYMJJgu+P9o9IyMHmyHvhAa1VhNKiRrbVL3ma66Zl7v9H14ojrzD7EUkf6+0m 5/y/je0Hs5p0QkYxhA5/zbuiGNon77sjxoUltWlXdALIkBDGXVn+IZMuK4ac7nHaLhJ5 hXN3WMvIq92kiuATVpr4bs3rHH1rlHimaFNMXCkN3YDo9J2rUMNTmfrAHZmh/478ZGAB 6zeHApbfzOGxpKdcT7MURTynsejrylfgMA8ftGZ3Nv70ioOywizolVvDcvEIYjtcF37U SDtA==
- In-reply-to: <87feb6be-0dde-4d19-bc4b-9acbb2f2bdd2@googlegroups.com>
- References: <87feb6be-0dde-4d19-bc4b-9acbb2f2bdd2@googlegroups.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
On 4/5/2014 1:04 PM, Joe Herdler wrote:
I am currently putting together my S-100 serial board (V3), and am in
the process of sourcing the ICs. I cannot seem to be able to find a
Z8530 but have seen many Z8530As out there. Would it be acceptable to
use the Z8530A for this board?
Can't see why it wouldn't be. The Z8630 is a 4mhz part, the Z8630A is a
6mhz part. Same spec's otherwise.
- Gary