[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [N8VEM-S100:3431] S-100 boards in work - uPD7220



Hi David,

I have the file fine and have generated the gerbers and will be placing
the order with 4pcb.com shortly for their $33 proto boards.

We can deal with payment when the boards arrive.  If you each want to
send along your mailing address to this email privately then I can
probably work out shipping costs (based on other S-100 boards.)  I like
to ship with cardboard around the board inside a padded Priority Mail
flat rate envelope ($5.95 in the US) but I'm certainly open to shipping
using a different method.  Obviously it will be different for those of
you outside the US.

I'll update you when the order is accepted by 4pcb.com.

Regards,

Todd

* David Fry <dgf...@googlemail.com> [140501 04:19]:
> Hi Todd,
>  
> The consensus is to go with http://www.4pcb.com/33-each-pcbs/
>  
> Numbers wise we will need 7 PCB's
>  
> 2 x John (Monahan)
> 2 x Dave (Yoda)
> 2 x Fabio
> 1 x Me (David Fry)
>  
> I have already uploaded the KiCad files to the Wiki under the S100 section, 
> the link is below,
> http://n8vem-sbc.pbworks.com/w/file/79620803/S100%20uPD7220_Proto_01.zip
> double check the pcb board identifier (lower right corner) to satisfy 
> yourself you have the correct file.
> Note, the file set was saved under a recent release of KiCad, if you have 
> any problems let me know.
>  
> Once you have a price for the order then let us each know what we owe you, 
> I guess once you have the boards you can let us know what shipping will be 
> from you to each of us.
>  
> Many thanks for you help
>  
> David Fry
> 
> On Saturday, April 26, 2014 5:56:07 PM UTC+1, monahanz wrote:
> 
> >  I think we need to do a prototype run on that board first.  While it 
> > contains elements of 3 previous boards we did,  it is the first time they 
> > are all put together in one place.  Also as a few of us know, we had real 
> > problems with that BT478 chip on the VDP board (which itself BTW needs to 
> > have another prototype run).
> >
> >  
> >
> > On the 7220 I will help out with the hardware, the thing to remember about 
> > the 7220 is you have to do quite a bit of software writing to get it to be 
> > of any use.   Is somebody prepared to do that. Because without software 
> > that chip/board  is useless.
> >
> >  
> >
> > John
> >
> >  
> >
> >  
> >
> > *From:* n8ve...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> [mailto:
> > n8ve...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>] *On Behalf Of *David Fry
> > *Sent:* Saturday, April 26, 2014 7:40 AM
> > *To:* n8ve...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> > *Subject:* Re: [N8VEM-S100:3295] S-100 boards in work
> >
> >  
> >  
> > Hi Ed,
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > Andrew has uploaded the EDA files for the uPD7220 GDC this afternoon, if 
> > you feel inclined to do a production run then put me down for 1 board
> >  
> > just for curiosity value. It might be worth considering a smaller run of 5 
> > to 10 boards as this board has failed to spark sufficient interest for a 
> > production run
> >  
> > before. looking a previous forum posts for the uPD7220 GDC it would appear 
> > to be a descendant of the ECB uPD7220 graphics board interfaced to the S100 
> > bus and is ripe for testing.
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/n8vem-s100/upd7220/n8vem-s100/KNTuzzAdKbU/XIY-yZTK4dUJ
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > Regards
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > David Fry
> >  
> >
> > On Friday, April 25, 2014 11:19:04 PM UTC+1, Edward Snider wrote:
> >
> >  It does seem like it would be an interesting board for an S100 system.   
> >  
> > With almost all of the work done it would be a shame not to go through to 
> > completion.
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > Unfortunately I don't have enough of a system together to help in testing, 
> > but I can chip in a bit
> >  
> > for prototypes.  I'd also be willing to handle the production run if we 
> > can get takers for at least
> >  
> > 20 boards, if that would be helpful.
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > Ed
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >
> > On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 1:45:38 AM UTC-5, nekonoko wrote: 
> >
> > Hi Andrew, 
> >
> > I can definitely see chipping in at least some of the cost. I find the 
> > uPD7220 GDC interesting as several business class CP/M systems used it for 
> > graphics (DEC Rainbow, QX-10 etc.). 
> >
> > Thanks much, 
> >
> > Pete 
> >
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "N8VEM-S100" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > email to n8vem-s...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "N8VEM-S100" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to n8vem-s100+...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.