[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [N8VEM-S100:3349] S-100 boards in work - uPD7220



Hi Todd,
 
Thanks for your offer of co-ordinating the ordering and distribution of the prototype PCB, much appreciated
feel free to add yourself to the PCB order in case no one picks up the x86 platform (you may have time later)
 
So far we have,
 
Fabio x 1 (6502)
Yoda (Dave) x 1 (68K)
Me x 1 (Z80)
Todd (PCB Procurement)
 
John, are you still willing to do hardware support if we run into a brick wall with the board, if so how many PCB's do you need ?
 
regards
 
David Fry

On Monday, April 28, 2014 9:03:17 PM UTC+1, Todd Goodman wrote:
Hi David,

I'm willing to take on ordering and distribution of the protoype PCBs.

I'd like to sign up for the x86 code as well, but I fear I'm too busy at
work and don't have a good system to test with at this time in any case.

Todd

* David Fry <dgf...@googlemail.com> [140428 12:04]:
> Hi Dave,
>  
> Excellent, many thanks.
> As a test program written in 'C' already exists you will probably make some
> headway on the 68K platform.
>  
> As Andrew has suggested in another post a good source for prototype PCB's
> would be http://www.4pcb.com/33-each-pcbs/
> based in the USA, this to me would seem to be the most economical route to
> take.
>  
> Is there anyone who could take on:-
>  
> 1) developing the x86 code for the uPD7220
>  
> 2) handle the ordering and distribution of the prototype PCB's
>  
> I am live in the UK and with import duties and taxes into the UK on items
> over £30 it makes more sense for someone in the USA to do this.
>  
> regards and thanks
>  
> David Fry
>
> On Saturday, April 26, 2014 5:56:07 PM UTC+1, monahanz wrote:
>
> >  I think we need to do a prototype run on that board first.  While it
> > contains elements of 3 previous boards we did,  it is the first time they
> > are all put together in one place.  Also as a few of us know, we had real
> > problems with that BT478 chip on the VDP board (which itself BTW needs to
> > have another prototype run).
> >
> >  
> >
> > On the 7220 I will help out with the hardware, the thing to remember about
> > the 7220 is you have to do quite a bit of software writing to get it to be
> > of any use.   Is somebody prepared to do that. Because without software
> > that chip/board  is useless.
> >
> >  
> >
> > John
> >
> >  
> >
> >  
> >
> > *From:* n8ve...@googlegroups.com <_javascript_:> [mailto:
> > n8ve...@googlegroups.com <_javascript_:>] *On Behalf Of *David Fry
> > *Sent:* Saturday, April 26, 2014 7:40 AM
> > *To:* n8ve...@googlegroups.com <_javascript_:>
> > *Subject:* Re: [N8VEM-S100:3295] S-100 boards in work
> >
> >  
> >  
> > Hi Ed,
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > Andrew has uploaded the EDA files for the uPD7220 GDC this afternoon, if
> > you feel inclined to do a production run then put me down for 1 board
> >  
> > just for curiosity value. It might be worth considering a smaller run of 5
> > to 10 boards as this board has failed to spark sufficient interest for a
> > production run
> >  
> > before. looking a previous forum posts for the uPD7220 GDC it would appear
> > to be a descendant of the ECB uPD7220 graphics board interfaced to the S100
> > bus and is ripe for testing.
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/n8vem-s100/upd7220/n8vem-s100/KNTuzzAdKbU/XIY-yZTK4dUJ
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > Regards
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > David Fry
> >  
> >
> > On Friday, April 25, 2014 11:19:04 PM UTC+1, Edward Snider wrote:
> >
> >  It does seem like it would be an interesting board for an S100 system.  
> >  
> > With almost all of the work done it would be a shame not to go through to
> > completion.
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > Unfortunately I don't have enough of a system together to help in testing,
> > but I can chip in a bit
> >  
> > for prototypes.  I'd also be willing to handle the production run if we
> > can get takers for at least
> >  
> > 20 boards, if that would be helpful.
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > Ed
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >
> > On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 1:45:38 AM UTC-5, nekonoko wrote:
> >
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > I can definitely see chipping in at least some of the cost. I find the
> > uPD7220 GDC interesting as several business class CP/M systems used it for
> > graphics (DEC Rainbow, QX-10 etc.).
> >
> > Thanks much,
> >
> > Pete
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "N8VEM-S100" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to n8vem-s100+...@googlegroups.com <_javascript_:>.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "N8VEM-S100" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to n8vem-s100+...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.