Re: [N8VEM-S100:964] V96BMC-33LP (Rev-D)?

[mike <mi...@pikeaero.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm so confused! :(

In any case, the Rev-D looks like it's much more hard to come by.

I may be wrong about the Rev-A/B can anyone else decypher the docs and
confirm that the Rev-A/B can also handle a 512MB arrangement? I am
starting to think it can.

Anyway there's a lot of stuff there to chew on....I'll have to have a
look again another day with a fresh brain.

- --Mike

On 07/15/2012 11:55 PM, mike wrote:
> 
> 
> I just realized, I think the Rev-D part has a 'D' suffix, I think
> the parts I got quotes on are the Rev-A/B parts (256MB).
> 
> Trying to clarify that.
> 
> On 07/15/2012 11:47 PM, mike wrote:
> 
>> More documents on the V96BMC chip.
> 
>> There is one document that covers programming the plain V96BMC 
>> (not Rev-D) so only appear to be capable of driving 256MB DRAMs
>> but should be pretty similar. I'll continue to see if I can find
>> the programming data for Rev-D.
> 
>> --Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQA55IAAoJEA7EcEr0emgfl5kH/ArgdFwDyzXf3VZ26Fl564HV
hGrYd3lm2dCi5ppYLbh4vSXdkPNLx6LReTtCJHwsdKlaCAcCI0iREwElaiUucIUS
pG8N+RumOJLfAw3mYFED+udf4y6gRfpEI7dSMaOLkQnGNwziRFrf1xWBLfW70y/U
sT9LLYSe+zteCg3C3wMZ1GE5Sa4bkVxScoWi1Hr5T9wMOz5XcN21jf/UOBpcWV5Z
VjJ4+29kR4uIVEAZqpf4CMASyLGCccbP9U/lKGPg5GTapNUGia0QorOkOXyMVkAW
PZFTCUI0upcnX90rmkcrctqQbz3zcfzWoig2bwRX28eoWpTqmB61Y1B4fVXj4fw=
=U8my
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----